The Bible And UFOS

Unmasking a deception

Is the bible at odds with UFOs? Over the years, efforts by biblical extremists gave rise to the most confusing web of biblical verses aimed to discredit God's infinite creation. I can do the same with War and Peace, even the Bill of Rights. These congested passages add little value to the objective mind, but do serve conservative purpose; belief by persistent deadening.

Literalization, mistranslated text out, of context with surrounding verses, and false scientific facts bundled into poetic rendering that never straight out proves; "UFOs and ETs don't exist." Antagonists swerve long around the subject trying to hit listener pain points, frighten them, detour objectivity, and in the end provide no real evidence; but sound trustworthy. Well, here's the evidence.


Why expose oneself unnecessarily to the wrath of 43,000 Christian denominations, if not more, struggling to be number one on the charts by all means possible? Because this issue, at last, needs sincerity and professional grade facts.

The inspiration for this page emerged after reviewing a write up by W. Gary Crampton from the Trinity Foundation in support of Creation Ministries' stance on ETs. It is admirable to challenge facts and voice lessons learned, but bolstering every imaginable dissenting view on UFOs and ETs from a biased religious point of view, while listing substandard assenting views to demonstrate the opposition's incompetence, slants the writer's own pre-meditated non-objective inclination. It's sad to see a huge roster of Ph.D.'s and engineers on the Creation Ministries website who failed to step-in and provide counter evidence on the subject, but I'm sure they have their reasons and I respect them.

Evidence should be clear cut, not complicated, straight forward, yes/no rather than maybe, and entirely independent of other sources. We need clarity and sincerity, not the river Styx flowing from compromised lips. Facts is what we need, not:

  • Compromising, biased, or radicalized religious affiliation
  • Personal opinions
  • Twisted, incomplete biblical verses or evidence
  • Doctrinal deduction and dogmas
  • Mistranslations
  • ​Amateurs, hoaxers


Antagonists claim NO tangible UFO pictures or videos exist, and no radar has ever detected one (entering our atmosphere).

VIDEO EVIDENCE: The following videos were taken by NASA, US and Mexican Air Force jets during missions, not amateurs:

PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE: The internet is filled with a host of pictures, but none carry as much weight as those taken by NASA, other space agencies, government documents, and historical paintings and wall reliefs:


Abductions have been shown to be "psychic [or spiritual] experiences." This opinion is not only absolutely baseless but born out of religious extremism; mainly the handy work of Allen and Gary Bates who have failed to investigate facts as shown below.

PHYSICAL EVIDENCE: A large number of abductions produce physical evidence. Not only bodily marks but also implants. The number of abduction implant medical extractions are incalculable. The link that follows shows removed implants, but it is one of several searchable pictures. Fortunately, medical experts did X-rays on patients prior to implant removal, then photographed and stored extracted implants for future study. While some implants proved to be a by-product of human anatomical functions, others were not, indicating that not all instances are the result of abductions but some are. Are abduction events mental events? You be the judge. Implant sample


Antagonists claim the bible makes NO statements about other worldly beings. "The Bible nowhere explicitly affirms or negates ETs. Implicitly (hinted, not solid), Scripture does deny the existence of such beings, thus negating the possibility of flying saucers guided by these so-called non-earthly creatures." "The Earth is the only place where man dwells."

EVIDENCE: See the following verses for actual "literal" evidence of biblical mention of other worldly beings. I have reservations when it comes to less obvious sources like chariots of fire or Ezequiel's metal cloud because it lacks referential content that solidly identifies UFOs or beings. They might, but it's best to side with caution. Besides, there is sufficient real evidence as shown below to remove all doubt.

Note that the word "host" in Hebrew [tsaba'] means host or army, mass of people, those that go forth. It does not mean stars but people:

  • "Then I turned, and lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a flying roll [megillah, roll, volume]. And he said unto me, What seest thou? And I answered, I see a flying roll; the length thereof is twenty cubits, and the breadth thereof ten cubits." Zechariah 5: 1 - 2
    • Based on Babylonian cubit (19.8 inch/cubit), the object measured roughly 33' x 17'

  • “Thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host [tsaba', mass of people, army that goes forth] … and the host of heaven worships thee.” Nehemiah 9: 6
    • stars do not worship, host/people do

  • “Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the hosts of them.” Genesis 2: 1
    • hosts are not heavenly objects or entirely of earth

  • “When thou seest the sun, moon, and stars, even all the hosts [tsaba'] of heaven … which the Lord thy God divided unto all nations ['am] under all heavens.” Deuteronomy 4: 19
    • "hosts" [tsaba'] are not stars but their residents
    • "divided" [chalaq, spread] across
    • heavenly nations ['am, people]

  • “Praise ye Him, all His hosts … sun and moon … stars of light.” Psalms 148: 2 - 3
    • not stellar objects, but people

  • They fought from heaven; the stars in their orbits fought against Sisera.” Judges 5: 20

  • “By the word of the LORD were the heavens made; and all the host of them.” Psalms 33: 6

  • “There was a day when the sons of God [ben elohym] came to present themselves before the Lord.” Job 1: 6

  • “Can thou guide Arcturus (star) with his sons?” Job 38: 32

  • "In my Father's house are many mansions." John 14: 2

  • "There were giants in the Earth." Genesis 6: 4
    • Giants is the word nephyil which stands for the Orion constellation as well as attacker

  • "And there we saw the giants." Numbers 13: 33
    • Second time word nephyil is used, denoting Orion, attacker, and high stature

  • "And I saw other lightnings and the stars of heaven, and I saw how He called them all by their names and they hearkened unto Him.
    • And I saw how they are weighed (calculate star mass) in a righteous balance according to their proportions of light.
    • (I saw) the width of their spaces (distance from star)
    • and the day of their appearing (orbital period),
    • and how their revolution produces lightning,
    • and (I saw) their revolution (day length) according to the number of the angels,
    • and (how) they keep faith with each other (gravitational balance)."
    • Book of Enoch, Chapter 43. (Computing Newton's Third Law of Gravitation)

The following references were taken from Ellen G. White's visions:

  • “The Spirit of God rested upon us in Brother C.'s humble dwelling, and I was wrapt in a vision of God's glory, and for the first time … had a view of other planets." Ellen G White, Spiritual Gifts, vol 2 p83

  • "Place was bright and glorious. Grass was living green. Birds warbled sweet songs. Inhabitants were of all sizes, noble, majestic, lovelyTheir countenances beamed with holy joy." Ellen G. White. Early Writings pp 39 – 40

The following quote is from Origen, one of the church founders:

  • “We see that not then for the first time did Divinity begin its work when it made this visible world (not the first creation): but just as after the destruction of this visible world there will be another world, its product, so also we believe that other worlds existed before the present came into being.” Origen, de Principiis, Bk.3, ch. 3, sec.3

Quick biblical reference counts:

  • Jehova (Lord) of Hosts:  294 times
  • Sons of God:  11 times
  • Astronomic references:  Incalculable
  • References to heavens:  739
  • Named references to stars:  75


The Westminster Shorter Catechism (Q. 9) mentions that the Bible "clearly" teaches that we live in a young universe (thousands of years old): “The work of creation is, God’s making all things of nothing, by the word of His power, in the space of six [24 hour] days, and all very good.”

EVIDENCE: Hebrew cannot be translated, especially the encoded bible, without Kabbalah. Regarding the six days of creation, grave misjudgments have taken place for thousands of years due to the use of translated works. Again, Hebrew cannot be translated.

  • In the beginning, God did not create Earth wasted and empty as translations assume. Mankind’s pre-Genesis errant activities made it that way. Refer to Isaiah 45:18 where ancient text plainly states that, ‘He created it not devastated, for He formed it to be inhabited,’ thus refuting present Genesis translations that portray Earth's early days as uninhabited because, it was populated "prior" to Genesis

  • Job 38:6–7 states, ‘Who laid Earth’s cornerstone, when the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy?' There were sons of God already living in space, or Earth, when Earth was created?

  • Six days is a mistranslation, rather it means "dusks and dawns." From dusk to dawn is NOT a 24 hour period but rather 12 hours, and that is extremely important. Go to this LINK for details. The meaning of ereb and bokerpoint to the pesha shamem ritual in Leviticus 24:2 and Daniel chapter 8, because those are the only verses where you the Hebrew words for "day" are used other than Genesis: those verses are related. Genesis days are periods, however stubbornly it might be refuted, but Hebrew fact and translation stands: Genesis days are not days but pesha periods

  • The book of Genesis states that ‘the earth was formless and empty, and darkness was upon the surface of the deep.’ Note that the word ‘tohuw’ stands for destroyed or devastated, not formless. ‘Bohuw’ means vague ruins, not empty. Another important clue is the word ‘darkness’ or ‘choshek,’ for darkness hung over Earth's destroyed, ruined world.


Matthew Henry points out that “the sons of God” are in all likelihood (he's not sure about it, in other words) the “professors of religion, called by the name of the Lord, and called upon that name,” sinfully marrying “the daughters of men, that is, those that were profane and strangers to God and godliness.”

EVIDENCE: This assumption, for it is not evidence by any sense of the word, has persuaded many to consider the possibility that tagging the sons of God in this passage as "aliens" is an “alien intrusion” into the Word of God. Assumptions are outright tamei, which in Hebrew stands for false religion. "Ben elohym," the sons of God, is found 11 times especially in Job 1 when they stand before God. If they were fallen from grace before the flood, what were they doing visiting God in Job's days? Thought they were locked up on Earth unable to leave and visit God, so assumptions go. Contrary to the proposed assumption, the sons of God were around before Earth's cornerstone was laid and they sang in joy along with the morning stars, or angels, meaning they are many and live in countless worlds. If a few of them fell from grace in Genesis 6, that does not involve the rest of creation but is an isolated case.


UFOs are the work of satan. According to Gary Bates (Marketing expert and CEO of Creation Ministries ... hint, hint), ETs are deceptive fallen angels taking people from Jesus.

EVIDENCE: According to this mother of all assumptions, an absolute second to none psychological deadening masterpiece, satan is to blame for UFO apparitions. Let's follow the evidence trail presented and see if that's what the bible really says, or if we're being put to sleep by means of subconscious resonance.

  • Satan transforms himself into an angel of light (2 Cor 11: 13 - 14). An angel of light mind you, not a mile-long metallic contraption with dozens of smaller craft inside and hundreds of beings. Funny thing is, this space craft has been filmed orbiting Saturn by Earth probes, but I thought satan was not allowed to leave this planet? Something doesn't add up here. See my Evidence segment containing NASA photos of space craft on Moon, Mars, and Saturn. Thus far, the bible says satan morphs into an angelic spirit, not physical objects, can't manufacture objects, and is stuck on this planet unable to leave. That being so, does this reference help this antagonist's views?

  • Paul is now brought into the picture tying satan's transformation abilities with spiritual hosts of wickedness in Ephesians 6: 12. Thus far, we have an angelic spirit that can't morph into a metallic object, that has a wicked mind, and is spirit rather than solid. Try to keep up, details do matter

  • Things now get really poetic, straying from that metallic object (we don't hear any more about it). We are taken from the core subject which are metallic apparitions into satan's ability to blind people's minds into not believing Christ and missing out on God's light, 2 Corinthians 4: 4. Nowhere does the bible say satan can make you see objects, and way farther yet turn into a metallic object himself

  • To top things off, we're reminded to trust the Savior, but trust Him on what? That satan is a spirit, that he can morph into a nice-looking spirit, cannot appear physically, and much less metallic and huge?

  • To end this massively assumed, distorted, harmful mind twister, Hosea 4:6 is brought up to vacuum up what lingering objective sense we have left. "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge." No kidding. As Hitler once said, "How fortunate for governments that their people don't think." In this case, how fortunate for belief systems that their people don't think. This is no epistemology but capricious verse blundering, ensuring that man's capacity to be objective is reduced and replaced by controlling all subject matters claiming to be intelligible or cognitive; controlled by central figures you MUST trust to be infallible because their version of the bible is infallible. Where does the bible endorse that?

We are dealing with spokespeople who set themselves up to be wiser than us by their own right under the guise of study and faith, created a bank of adapted translations to fit Julian's 500 AD mandates, and run rampant interpreting God's word unchecked. This is not faith but gullibility


Christ doesn't go from planet to planet redeeming people, only Earth, so ETs don't exist. God didn't fail to tell us about UFOs.

EVIDENCE: This assumes every planet fell which, as far as I am aware biblicly, only Earth did. Supporting this claim, check out Nehemiah 9: 6. It explicitly states that the host of heaven worships God. Doesn't sound like other planets are in a fallen state, does it?

That verse invalidates scores of imprisoning paragraphs that follow in Mr. Crampton's long drawn out reverie where people are reminded mercilessly of God's only son, the price of sacrifice, blood relationship, that the bible answers all questions, it's the only truth, and on and on it goes trying to make a far, far, far associative case built upon an invalid foundation of faith. Moreover, this lost soul stretches the bounds of already stained credibility to offensive levels by asking the public to ignore freedom of objectivity and renounce any evidence as fallacious except his, whether it be sightings, contacts, and other ET experiences because "the bible has a monopoly on truth." Well, not exactly. Which bible is the truth, the original, or his corrupted interpretation?